2) Currently the medical reform has been included in a "Pilot's Bill of Rights 2" which was introduced by Senator Jim Inhofe last February (Tennyson 2015). I'm guessing this makes the medical reform a "bill" so to say and it has been approved by the Senate and is currently in the process of getting through the House before it can be signed by the president.
3) An aspect of the medical reform that I would like to analyze is the form needed and the 4 year checkup required by pilots. One "for" on this topic is that it ensures the pilot is still medically sound to fly and with the exam being conducted with a personal physician there should be a relaxed comfort level so they pilot won't be afraid to reveal information. In the same aspect though, the personal physician could bypass certain tests they don't see necessary from their "medical judgement" and ok the pilot since they know them personally which could lead to a potential medical condition overlooked. Also, the fact that the medical conditions aren't required to be reported to the FAA unless specifically requested seems very discerning. This makes me believe that a pilot could potentially be unfit to fly due to some medical condition, but as long as they have the form signed and made a note in their logbook of the doctor visit, they technically are still able to fly without FAA intervention.
4) Personally I don't see the medical reform as being necessary. I think the requirement the FAA had in place where a pilot over 40 had to go for renewal every 2 years and every 5 years for a pilot under 40 was fine. I think this reform was instituted more for those older pilots so they can continue to fly as they age without having to go in for a medical certificate renewal. I also think the reform was put in place to aid in the growth of General Aviation by not requiring a renewal of the 3rd class medical unless you require a special issuance or are a new plot. The "10 years prior legislation" rule imposed in the medical reform seems excessive; for example, I would still be able to fly under this rule because I applied and received my first class medical certificate in 2011 so I would still be eligible to fly after this year (the 5 year mark) if I wanted to without needing ANY medical examination whatsoever. I understand from the GA's perspective how big of a reform this is for their aging members, but I just feel it could potentially lead to some medically unqualified pilots flying when they shouldn't be flying for the safety of other pilots in the air.
Works Cited
Tennyson, E. (2015, December 15). Full senate passes medical reform. In aopa.org.
Tennyson, E. (2015, December 9a). Third class medical reform FAQs. In aopa.org. Retrieved January 30, 2016.
Bergqvist, P. (2015, December 17). Senate passes third-class medical reform. In flyingmag.com.
I would have to agree with you on the aspect of the loopholes that could be exploited by only having to have a logbook endorsement from your personal physician. I find that this lack of oversight by the FAA could cause many more accidents due to unfit pilots. While this may cause a growth in general aviation, it potentially could create numerous other issues. Lastly, I would have to agree that this reform is not necessary the way it is currently written, and is to benefit the aging pilots who will soon be unable to obtain a third class medical.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI was denied a certificate but prior to that have held a 1st or 2nd class over the last 10 years, though not for the last 2. Would I fall into this exemption since I have held one "in" the last 10 years or "for" 10 years. The wording of in for or since make a huge difference
ReplyDeleteAnd Brandon, I am sure you would agree that the FAA is not always the most understanding of governmental groups. You can be just barely out of specs but totally fit and be denied (though I should have done a special issuance and didn't. I prob would have been accepted)
ReplyDeleteFor older pilots who have a tremendous amount of passion for flying I think passing this would be fair. They have no control over aging and having medical issues however by that age of being a pilot im sure they have learned to be responsible enough to determine whether or not they are healthy or fit enough to fly. every pilot no matter the age should have that proceedure before any flight no matter what. so passing something like this would take a burden off of those older pilots or those with a medical issue. im neither for or against it because it doesnt effect me for now since im young and healthy but if i was someone with a medical issue i would be for it.
ReplyDelete